Hasbro — Market overview

Global entertainment robot toys market size (USD billions)

  • 2024$16b
  • 2025$21b
  • 2026$27b
  • 2027$33b
  • 2028$39b
  • 2029$45b
  • 2030$51b
  • 2031$57b
  • 2032$63b
  • 2033$72b

UX Research · Client: Hasbro

Hasbro

Mixed-methods research on Gen Alpha play and parent attitudes toward AI-enabled toys, shaping an investment recommendation.

I designed survey questions, conducted user interviews, and built personas.

Role
Research Consultant, BCEC Consulting Group
Timeline
Spring 2025
Methods
Market Research, User Interviews, Surveys, Personas

Context & Challenge

A fast-growing market, and a generation raised on screens

BCEC Consulting Group worked with Hasbro on how Gen Alpha plays and how parents feel about AI-enabled toys, and turned the research into an investment recommendation and a set of new toy concepts.

in 2024
$15.6b
in 2033
$71.87b
compound annual growth rate (CAGR), 2024 to 2033
18.6%

Research Methods

Desk research, interviews with kids, and a parent survey

Market and secondary research

We reviewed market data alongside psychological and cognitive development studies, and research on how Gen Alpha socializes, plays, and engages with toys and technology.

Gen Alpha interviews

Interviews with Gen Alpha kids explored the kinds of play they enjoy (outside, creative, interactive, and digital), whether they prefer playing alone or with others, and whether they reach for screens or physical toys.

Parent survey

An online Qualtrics survey collected large-scale quantitative data on how parents see the role of technology in their children's play. We promoted it by posting on parental forums and through personal outreach.

Recorded responses
83
Hasbro — Chart 01

Survey respondents by age

  • 18–268
  • 27–4247
  • 43–5824
  • 59–774
Hasbro — Chart 02

Respondents with Gen Alpha children (born 2010–2024)

  • Yes72
  • No11

Key Findings

What kids want, and what parents need

How Gen Alpha plays

  • Personalized play

    Gen Alpha wants individualized play that reflects their identity and adapts to their preferences.

  • Education incorporated

    Toys that blend fun and learning, like STEM kits, DIY activities, and educational games, appeal to Gen Alpha.

  • Digital-first preferences

    Very engaged with digital entertainment. Toys tied to popular characters are received well, but interest fades quickly.

  • Interactive and social

    Games with avatar customization and social elements are favored, with strong interest in storytelling and exploration.

  • Combined elements

    Crossover physical-digital toys that combine entertainment, education, and personalization are generally received well.

  • Social media and influencers

    Social media has changed how kids discover toys; toys promoted by influencers on popular platforms are very popular with Gen Alpha.

What development research says about digital play

  • Cognitive impact

    Constant digital stimulation dulls the frontal lobe, leading to impatience, poor impulse control, and craving instant feedback.

  • Emotional implications

    Digital toys may replace real friendships, creating a “domination model” where kids control without accountability.

  • Social advantages

    Games with prosocial content could decrease antisocial thoughts, encourage tolerance, and reduce aggression.

In their words

  • “I like playing with farm animals and animals from the Savannah because I really like animal noises.”
    — participant, 7
  • “I like to sketch or draw because it sparks creativity, and I like that.”
    — participant, 12
  • “I like videogames because they tell a good and long story while still being engaging because you have a goal of winning.”
    — participant, 14
  • “I like to play tennis and hangout with my friends.”
    — participant, 11
  • “I prefer playing with friends, they're good at games and it's fun to spend time with my friends.”
    — participant, 10
  • “I like playing more with my tablet but I like playing with my dolls too. I always wanted to have a tablet so I use that more.”
    — participant, 11
  • “I like to play with both it just depends on what game I play. I like to play by myself because sometimes I like to be by myself but most of the time I like to play with friends or family cause it is really funny and cool.”
    — participant, 12

Parent attitudes toward tech-enabled toys

  • Tech vs. traditional

    Parents credit tech toys with promoting tech awareness, creativity, and education, but find traditional toys more stimulating overall, boosting social interaction, reading habits, hand-eye coordination, and outdoor play.

  • Concerns

    Sedentary lifestyle risks top the list: obesity, eye strain, social isolation, and weakened communication skills. Tech toys demand stricter supervision due to health and developmental concerns.

  • What parents weigh

    Price and budget, age recommendations, educational benefits, safety features and parental controls, and durability and boundary setting.

  • Mindset

    Cautiously optimistic but significantly skeptical. Parents demand strong privacy protections and clear educational benefits, and want tech toys to supplement, not replace, traditional social play.

Behavioral shifts in play & parent–child interaction

Visual/spatial orientation
19%
Sensory development
17%
Emotional growth
15%
Motor skills
6%

Parent–child communication during play is crucial for language development. Toys help parents engage with their kids, but digital technology can reduce interaction, harming vocalization and conversational skills.

From the parent survey

of parents very familiar with AI/AR/VR toys aren’t concerned about screen time
75%
of parents familiar with Hasbro consider creativity a top priority in toy selection
82.5%
of parents familiar with Hasbro prioritize educational value in toys
79.4%
of Hasbro-familiar parents value toys that are entertaining
72.2%

Familiarity reduces fear: education and exposure help reduce parental apprehension. And brand isn’t everything: despite Hasbro’s recognition, fewer parents chose parent recommendations, technological features, affordability, or brand recognition as key drivers.

Perception of AI and play, by parent age

of ages 18–26 and 59–77 have a neutral-positive perception of AI and play
75%
of ages 27–42 have a neutral-positive perception of AI and play
47%

Older age groups might need more reassurance for AI in toys.

Budgets and priorities

  • Low-cost toys (<$25)Prioritize entertainment
  • Mid-range toys ($26–$50)Prioritize creativity
  • High-cost toys ($51–$100+)Prioritize parental recommendations & technology

Parents who spend more on toys ($51–$100) are more likely to have positive or open-minded perceptions of AI, making them the ideal early adopters. Hasbro can tailor marketing and features by price tier.

Personas

Three Gen Alpha players

  • Hasbro — Persona 01

    Tristan — Teen Gamer

    Primarily male · Ages 11–15 · Plays daily

    Tristan is a teen obsessed with gaming and digital exploration, interested in products with AR/VR elements. He wants to grow and show off his skills while enjoying time with friends.

    Goals

    • Competitive climber: Focused on improving performance and climbing the ranks.
    • Social connector: Bonds with friends through shared gaming experiences.
    • Identity explorer: Uses gaming as a space to express identity and find belonging.
    • Peer recognition seeker: Aims to gain respect and recognition from peers.

    Pain points

    • FOMO: Feels left out and socially disconnected if not playing trending games.
    • High costs: Gaming gear and subscriptions add up fast and require parental support.
    • Negative stigma: Adults often view gaming as unproductive or associate it with addiction.
    • Burnout: Competitive online play can cause stress and lead to emotional exhaustion.
  • Hasbro — Persona 02

    Miah — Mini Influencer

    Primarily female · Ages 8–13 · Plays daily

    Miah is a social-media-obsessed preteen who stays on top of trends so she has the newest, coolest items. She wants toys that are popular but still let her express her own identity.

    Goals

    • Trendsetter: Stays updated on toys, digital collectibles, and games.
    • Self-expression: Loves customizing characters to show style and mood.
    • Digital-physical connection: Enjoys toys that merge the digital and physical worlds.
    • Cozy play style: Prefers casual, cozy gaming experiences.

    Pain points

    • FOMO: Feels pressured to keep up with influencers and trends.
    • Mental health: Comparison and obsession with social media can harm mental health.
    • Financial constraints: Trendy items and gadgets are expensive and add up.
    • Social pressure: Fear of being left out if not up to date on trends.
  • Hasbro — Persona 03

    Adrian — Imaginative Maker

    Mixed gender · Ages 4–12 · Plays a few times a week

    Adrian is a curious, creative kid who loves blending physical toys with digital play, like Lego, Pokémon, and Minecraft. They want toys that let their imagination run wild.

    Goals

    • Balance: Seeks a healthy mix of digital and physical experiences.
    • Creative games: Enjoys games that foster creativity (e.g., Lego, Barbie, Roblox, Minecraft, The Sims 4).
    • Cozy play style: Prefers cozy games (e.g., Stardew Valley) over competitive ones.
    • Immersive experience: Enjoys combining elements for a more immersive experience.

    Pain points

    • Limited space: Small spaces restrict physical play and make it hard to store larger toys or creative materials.
    • Gets bored easily: If a toy doesn’t offer multiple ways to explore creativity, interest fades quickly.
    • Burnout: Jumping between digital and physical activities can lead to burnout.

Recommendation

Pilot AI-integrated robotic toys, early

Market and consumer readiness

growth expected from 2024–2030 in the US entertainment robot market
43.3%
global AI robotics market by 2034, at a 21.9% CAGR
$124.26B
of younger parents (18–26) have neutral to positive views on AI, and lower screen time concern
75%

Hasbro is already a leader in robotic toys, with strong brand recognition and a competitive advantage in IP, storytelling, and physical toy design.

  1. Short term: 1–5 years

    Pilot 1–2 AI-integrated robotics toys

    • Use first-mover advantage before market saturation
    • Test in child-saturated markets
    • Leverage testing and refine

    Begin forming strategic partnerships

    • University labs
    • Startups
    • US-based manufacturers
    • Parent influencers

    Target product marketing

    • Educational, STEM, and physical benefits
    • Safe and private data practices
  2. Long term: 5–10 years

    Expand across IPs

    • Gradually expand AI integration across more intellectual properties

    Build a moat

    • Build a defensible moat via storytelling and smart tech

Toy concepts

Six concepts from our ideation, three robotic and three creative:

  • NERF Battle Bots (robotic)

    High-energy robots for kids who crave action and strategy: they shoot foam darts, navigate obstacles, and team up into battle squads, with customizable looks and performance.

  • Paw Pal (robotic)

    A robot companion modeled on a cat, dog, or creature that mimics its behaviors, teaching responsibility and offering companionship to families who can’t keep a real pet. Combines physical play with adaptive AI.

  • Lingo Buddy (robotic)

    An interactive robot doll that transforms between a friendly character and a learning device, teaching new languages through play, stories, and conversation.

  • Escape to the Sketch (creative)

    A Play-Doh addition: kids build shapes, people, and storylines, then scan them into an app that uses AI to bring their stories to life, with room for collectible kits, new story arcs, and mini games.

  • RePuzzle (creative)

    Personalized puzzles and cubes with mini screens that let kids upload and solve their own photos, with a built-in timer, a multiplayer app, and a global leaderboard.

  • Quantum Arena (creative)

    Action figures that can be played physically or scanned into a digital space with racing, story, and educational games, plus opportunities to collect, compete, and socialize.

Team

  • William HansenProject Manager
  • Thy LeProject Manager
  • Sarah WangProject Manager
  • Michelle LiuProject Manager
  • Avery Roslansky
  • Avani Gireesha
  • Daisy Huang
  • Edward Jue
  • Gabrielle Soetomo
  • Keeley Jibben
  • Neha Haresh
Next projectLinkedIn →